What is Arbitration?

AM Editorial Team

Updated on:

Arbitration is a method of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) that serves as a viable substitute to traditional court litigation. In this process, disputing parties agree to submit their conflict to a mutually acceptable, neutral third party, known as an arbitrator. The arbitrator’s role is akin to that of a judge, although the setting is typically less formal than a courtroom.

A round table with two opposing sides, a neutral arbitrator in the middle, and a document being reviewed by both parties

As a structured form of resolution, arbitration provides a private, binding decision based on the merits of the case presented by the parties involved. One of the distinctive features of arbitration is its finality; the decision rendered by the arbitrator is usually conclusive, and the avenues for appeal are limited. Parties often opt for arbitration with the expectation of a less expensive and more expedient resolution compared to drawn-out court battles.

The process is governed by a set of rules that both parties agree to follow, which may include limitations on evidence and prescribed timelines. The arbitration procedure can be tailored to the needs of the disputants, allowing for flexibility in choosing the arbitrators expertise relevant to the subject matter of the dispute. Arbitration is recognized for enabling parties to resolve disputes discreetly while still ensuring that the outcome is recognized and enforceable through legal frameworks, such as under the guidelines of the Federal Arbitration Act.

Understanding Arbitration

Arbitration is an alternative to traditional court litigation, offering a binding resolution to disputes. It is typically a faster and more cost-effective method favored by private parties, especially in commercial disputes.

Definition and Scope

Arbitration is a form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in which a neutral third party, the arbitrator, makes a decision about a dispute. Binding arbitration results in a decision that the parties agree to abide by, while non-binding arbitration allows for the decision to be dismissed by either party, potentially leading to litigation. Arbitration can be mandatory or voluntary and applies to both domestic and international disputes.

Comparison with Litigation

Arbitration differs from court litigation in several key aspects. The process is generally private, without the formalities of a court proceeding. Parties often choose arbitration for its relative speed and cost-consciousnesscompared to the lengthy and expensive court process. Unlike litigation, where a judge or jury makes a decision, in arbitration, the disputing parties have the opportunity to select their arbitrator.

Forms of Arbitration

  • Commercial Arbitration: Used primarily in business disputes, this form addresses disagreements between commercial entities over contractual obligations.
  • International Arbitration: Involves parties from different countries seeking a neutral forum to resolve cross-border disputes.
  • Domestic Arbitration: Handles disputes within the confines of one country’s jurisdiction, applying local laws to the resolution process.

The Arbitration Process

The arbitration process is a method of dispute resolution that operates as an alternative to litigation. It is typically faster and less formal, wherein the parties submit their disagreement to one or more arbitrators for a binding decision.

Initiating Arbitration

To begin arbitration, one party must send a notice to the other party, outlining their intent to arbitrate and the basic facts of the dispute. This initial step often follows the guidelines set forth in an arbitration agreement. The receiving party then has a set period to respond, acknowledging the arbitration and any claimed disputes.

Selection of Arbitrator

The parties involved in the arbitration will typically agree upon an arbitrator or a panel, known as a tribunal. The selection is guided by factors such as expertise, neutrality, and the specific terms of the arbitration clauses. Organizations like the American Arbitration Association, JAMS, or the National Arbitration Forum often provide lists of potential arbitrators.

Conducting the Arbitration Hearing

During the arbitration hearing, parties present evidence and arguments to the arbitrator or tribunal. The procedure tends to be less formal than court proceedings, but it still allows both sides to be heard, cross-examine witnesses, and submit relevant documents. The arbitrator directs the hearing to ensure that it proceeds in a fair and orderly manner.

Closing Arguments and Deliberation

After the presentation of evidence and testimonies, the parties may offer closing arguments. Then, the arbitrator or members of the tribunal deliberate on the information presented. In this phase, they review the facts, the applicable law, and the terms of the arbitration agreement, if present, before reaching a decision, or ruling.

The Award and Enforcement

The final step is the issuance of an award, where the arbitrator renders a decision that can include monetary compensation or specific actions to be carried out by a party. The award is legally binding and subject to enforcement by courts, unless successfully challenged within a very narrow set of parameters established by the arbitration framework or the law.

Legal Framework

A scale balancing a gavel and a set of law books, with a backdrop of legal documents and a symbol of justice

The regulatory structure for arbitration in the United States is grounded in a series of laws and acts intended to support and maintain its use as an alternative dispute resolution method. These ensure that arbitration remains a viable and enforceable option for parties seeking to resolve disputes outside the traditional courtroom setting.

Federal Arbitration Act

The Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), enacted in 1925, provides the statutory foundation for the enforcement of arbitration agreements. It applies to all written arbitration agreements related to transactions involving interstate commerce. The FAA affirms the validity of arbitration agreements and intends to ensure that courts honor them. This act reflects a federal policy favoring arbitration and the Supreme Court continues to interpret its provisions in support of its authority.

Uniform Arbitration Act

To provide greater uniformity among states, the Uniform Arbitration Act (UAA) was developed by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws. While not mandatory, it has been adopted, with some modifications, by many states. The UAA typically deals with the conduct of the arbitration process, outlining steps from the arbitration agreement to the arbitration hearing and the enforceability of awards. It aims to simplify arbitration procedures and promote consistency across different jurisdictions.

State Arbitration Laws

Despite the federal dominance due to the FAA, individual states have their own arbitration laws which regulate agreements and proceedings not covered by federal statute. These can vary significantly and often exist in complement to common law principles. State courts may interpret and apply both the UAA and their own local laws, which can lead to varying outcomes in different jurisdictions. State laws play a critical role especially when the federal arbitration act is not applicable or when parties choose to resolve their disputes strictly under state law.

Role of Parties and Professionals

A round table surrounded by lawyers, arbitrators, and parties in discussion. Documents and evidence displayed. Professional atmosphere

In arbitration, the efficacy and fairness of the process largely depend on the active roles of the involved parties and professionals. These roles are distinct and vital to ensuring that arbitration serves as an effective alternative to litigation.

Role of the Parties

The parties in arbitration are the individuals or entities in dispute, and their primary role is to select a neutral third party, commonly referred to as the arbitrator or the arbitral tribunal when it consists of a panel of arbitrators. They are responsible for presenting their case, including evidence and arguments, to the arbitrator. The parties’ cooperation and candor are crucial as they must abide by the arbitrator’s final decision.

Role of Legal Counsel

The attorneys or legal counsel play a supportive and advisory role for the parties, crafting legal arguments and guiding their clients through the arbitration process. Their expertise is invaluable for understanding the subtleties of the case and the applicable law, as well as for negotiating arbitration agreements that delineate the authority and procedure of the arbitration tribunal.

Role of the Arbitrator

The arbitrator is an impartial individual chosen to resolve the dispute based on the evidence and arguments presented. Arbitrators must manage the proceedings with fairness and efficiency and have the authority to make binding decisions. The success of an arbitration often rests on the arbiter‘s expertise and capacity to act justly without the formalities of a traditional court.

Arbitration Clauses and Agreements

An arbitration panel sits at a table, reviewing documents and discussing a legal case. The room is professional and formal, with neutral colors and minimal decor

Arbitration clauses and agreements are essential mechanisms in contracts that dictate how disputes should be resolved. They can significantly impact the rights and duties of the parties involved.

Drafting an Arbitration Clause

When drafting an arbitration clause, careful consideration must be given to the scope of disputes covered and the selection of the arbitration process. A contract should clearly state that in the event of a dispute, arbitration is the preferred method of resolution. The clause should include specifics about the rules governing the process, the location of arbitration, and whether the arbitration will be binding or non-binding.

Validity and Challenges

The validity of an arbitration clause is determined by whether it was entered into freely and if it sufficiently covers the scope of potential disputes. Challenges to an arbitration clause typically arise due to concerns over mandatory arbitration clauses, perceived unfairness, or a lack of clarity within the terms. Courts may scrutinize the terms of service to ensure that mandatory arbitration is not being used to undermine statutory rights.


An arbitration agreement is generally considered enforceable if it complies with relevant legislation, such as the Federal Arbitration Act, which recognizes the legality of arbitration agreements. Enforcement may be contested if a party believes the agreement is unconscionable or entered into under duress. It is essential that the agreement is crafted in a form that aligns with the legal standards to mitigate against potential challenges.

Types of Arbitration

There are several types of arbitration, each catering to specific scenarios and governed by distinct rules and characteristics. Key differences pertain to the nature of the dispute, the parties involved, and the legal frameworks under consideration.

Commercial Arbitration

Commercial arbitration addresses disputes between businesses or between businesses and individuals, often arising from commercial contracts. It serves as an efficient alternative to court litigation, providing a binding resolution in a business-friendly environment. The arbitrator, or panel, is typically chosen for their expertise in commercial law and the industry in question.

Consumer Arbitration

In consumer arbitration, disagreements between consumers and companies concerning product or service contracts are resolved. This form of arbitration is usually mandated by consumer contracts and is intended to be faster and less formal than traditional court procedures. It often requires a single arbitrator with experience in consumer law.

Employment Arbitration

Disputes stemming from employment contracts are settled through employment arbitration. These can include cases such as wrongful termination, discrimination, or breach of contract. Employment arbitration is sometimes a condition of employment, where employees agree to arbitrate any workplace disputes as an alternative to litigation.

International Arbitration

Postured as the predominant method for resolving disputes in international commercial arbitration, this process deals with conflicts between parties from different countries. The necessity for arbitration arises due to the complexities involved with cross-border legalities and the desire for neutrality. International arbitration conventions and treaties ensure enforceability of awards across borders, providing businesses with a secure means of international dispute resolution.

Rights and Procedures

In arbitration, parties have specific rights and must adhere to defined procedures that differ from traditional courts. These include limitations on evidence and discovery, restricted rights to appeal, and distinctive arbitral procedures all parties must follow.

Evidence and Discovery

In arbitration, the Federal Rules of Evidence typically do not apply as strictly as they would in a trial. Parties may present evidence, but arbitrators have the discretion to determine its admissibility. Discovery may be more limited, with the intent to expedite the arbitration process. For example, depositions are commonly fewer and less thorough than in court litigation, prioritizing the efficient resolution of the dispute.

Right to Appeal

Arbitration is known for providing a binding decision, which usually leaves minimal room for appeal. The rights to appeal an arbitrator’s decision are substantially limited compared to those in a trial. An appeal is mainly permissible on grounds of an arbitrator’s misconduct, fraud, a clear disregard for the applicable law, or if the award is in violation of public policy.

Arbitral Procedures

The arbitral procedures govern the framework and conduct of the arbitration process. They generally offer flexibility and can vary based on the parties’ agreement or institutional rules chosen by the parties, such as those provided by the International Chamber of Commerce. These procedures dictate how an arbitration will be conducted from inception to the rendering of the decision, including the crucial concept of arbitrability, which determines whether a particular dispute falls within the scope of the arbitration agreement.

Outcomes of Arbitration

In arbitration, the resolution of a dispute culminates in a decision or award that is legally binding and enforceable. The nature and enforceability of arbitration outcomes are critical for the parties involved.

Nature of Decisions

Arbitration typically concludes with an arbitrator or a panel issuing a decision or award that resolves the contesting parties’ dispute. Unlike a court judgment, an arbitration award is not public record and may involve less formal procedures. The decision is intended to be final and binding, offering limited scope for appeals. Parties often prefer arbitration for its confidential and conclusive nature.

Settlement and Resolution

Prior to the issuance of an award, parties may reach a settlement. Settlements in arbitration allow the disputing entities to end the arbitration process by mutual agreement if they find a resolution satisfactory to all involved. This can not only expedite the process but often results in lower costs and a more amicable outcome.

Post-Arbitration Actions

Following the arbitrator’s decisionenforcement of the award is paramount. National laws typically support the enforcement of arbitration awards, aligning with international treaties such as the New York Convention. The prevailing party may enforce the award in courts, often in a different jurisdiction from where the arbitration took place. However, enforcement can be challenged under specific circumstances defined by the arbitration agreement or applicable law.

Advantages and Disadvantages

When exploring arbitration, one must consider its potential for cost-effectiveness and confidentiality as well as its drawbacks, including questions of fairness and potential for mandatory arbitration.

Benefits of Arbitration

Cost Savings: They often find arbitration to be less expensive compared with court proceedings due to lower legal fees and swifter resolution times. In arbitration, parties typically spend less on attorney fees and pretrial activities, which can be more extensive in litigation. Another advantage is confidentiality, where the details of the dispute and its resolution are not made public, unlike most court cases.

Expertise & Flexibility: Arbitration allows parties to select an arbitrator with specialized knowledge relevant to their dispute, leading to more informed decisions. It also offers greater scheduling flexibility compared to court calendars. The process is often viewed as more efficient than court litigation, and sometimes, prescribed as part of a mandatory arbitration clause within contracts.

Criticism and Limitations

Fairness & Control: Critics argue that arbitration can result in outcomes that skew against one party, particularly when mandatory arbitration is involved. Concerns have been raised about the arbitrability of certain disputes and whether arbitration provides a level playing field, as parties might have unequal influence in selecting arbitrators.

Limited Recourse: One major limitation is the lack of appeal options available after arbitration, which can be problematic if one believes the outcome to be unjust. Moreover, some criticize the status of arbitration as not being as transparent as public court proceedings, potentially resulting in less accountability for the outcomes. Arbitration does not always come with the precedent-setting function of court decisions, which can aid in the clarification and evolution of the law.

Frequently Asked Questions

Arbitration serves as a method to resolve disputes outside the court system. It brings a binding resolution without the need for a trial, but its functions and implications may raise several questions.

How does arbitration differ from mediation in dispute resolution?

Arbitration is a more formal process than mediation. In arbitration, an arbitrator hears evidence and makes a decision that is usually binding, whereas mediation involves a mediator helping the parties to reach a mutual agreement, which may not be binding.

What constitutes an arbitration agreement in legal terms?

An arbitration agreement is a contract in which two or more parties agree to settle any future disputes through arbitration instead of litigation, effectively waiving their right to sue.

What are the typical steps involved in the arbitration process?

The typical steps in the arbitration process include the selection of an arbitrator, an initial meeting to define the arbitration rules, the exchange of statements and evidence, the arbitration hearing, and finally, the arbitrator’s decision and award.

How is arbitration utilized within the baseball industry?

In the baseball industry, arbitration is used to resolve salary disputes between players and teams. Players with a certain amount of service time can request arbitration to decide their salary if they cannot reach an agreement with the team.

In what ways does arbitration impact insurance claims?

Arbitration in insurance claims provides a mechanism for insurers and policyholders to resolve disputes without going to court, which can be faster and less costly than litigation.

What are the implications of a case being referred to arbitration?

When a case is referred to arbitration, the parties involved will typically engage in a legally binding process outside of the courtroom, where an arbitrator’s decision can be enforceable in the same manner as a court judgment.